If you take those away, is there any performance difference between the two? Will one give me more polygons than the other? I would presume they are the same since they both have direct access to the same hardware on the machine.Īny experience or thoughts on this matter would be greatly appreciated. And using unity inconveniences the user by forcing them to install a plugin (which I view as a huge barrier). Weighing the pros and cons, I see the downside of webgl as not having IE support (yet). I don't need constant changes to my scene. (2) The scene will be largely static, I will load my scene and then I just want to navigate around it and explore that way. I want, hopefully, 1 million polygons/points, 10 million polygons/points, 50 million polygons/points? What is realistically possible?

I want as many polygons/points as I can get. (1) The most important part is the resolution of the scene. (Are there any other options that I'm missing?) My needs for the application are fairly standard, however, these are the focal points: Or I can use a browser plugin such as unit圓d (i'm sure there are others and for the point of this question, are equivalent). The research that I've done shows two major options here. I have been tasked with rendering and manipulating 3d objects in the browser and really want a robust application.

Unity cloud build web player vs web gl